Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Phlebology ; 35(9): 706-714, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32611228

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism is a potentially fatal complication of superficial endovenous treatment. Proper risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis could mitigate this hazard; however, there are currently no evidence-based or consensus guidelines. This study surveyed UK and Republic of Ireland vascular consultants to determine areas of consensus. METHODS: A 32-item survey was sent to vascular consultants via the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (phase 1). These results generated 10 consensus statements which were redistributed (phase 2). 'Good' and 'very good' consensus were defined as endorsement/rejection of statements by >67% and >85% of respondents, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-two consultants completed phase 1. This generated seven statements regarding risk factors mandating peri-procedural pharmacoprophylaxis and three statements regarding specific pharmacoprophylaxis regimes. Forty-seven consultants completed phase 2. Regarding venous thromboembolism risk factors mandating pharmacoprophylaxis, 'good' and 'very good' consensus was achieved for 5/7 and 2/7 statements, respectively. Regarding specific regimens, 'very good' consensus was achieved for 3/3 statements. CONCLUSIONS: The main findings from this study were that there was 'good' or 'very good' consensus that patients with any of the seven surveyed risk factors should be given pharmacoprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. High-risk patients should receive one to two weeks of pharmacoprophylaxis rather than a single dose.


Assuntos
Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Reino Unido , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
2.
J Vasc Access ; 21(5): 623-629, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31865861

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Duplex ultrasound surveillance with pre-emptive treatment of an identified stenosis is increasingly being utilised to help maintain arteriovenous fistula patency. This study aims to determine whether post-operative duplex ultrasound surveillance can improve fistula patency at 12 months and improve the proportion of 'pre-haemodialysis' patients commencing haemodialysis via a usable fistula. METHODS: All arteriovenous fistulae formed between 1st January 2015 and 31st August 2017 in a single, tertiary vascular centre were included. Primary and secondary patency at 12 months, along with the proportion of pre-haemodialysis patients commencing haemodialysis via a usable arteriovenous fistula, were compared between the fistulae undergoing duplex ultrasound surveillance and 'standard practice'. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one arteriovenous fistulae were created in 216 patients. A higher proportion of brachiobasilic transposition arteriovenous fistula and patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation following a previously failed access were identified in the duplex ultrasound surveillance group. Primary patency at 12 months (hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval = 0.30-0.61, p < .001) was significantly lower in the duplex ultrasound surveillance group compared with the 'standard practice' group. Despite this, no difference was identified in secondary patency at 12 months (hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.87-3.80, p = .112). No difference was also identified in the proportion of pre-haemodialysis patients starting haemodialysis with a usable arteriovenous fistula (duplex ultrasound surveillance = 65.0% vs standard practice = 77.8%; odds ratio = 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.19, p = .279). CONCLUSION: Post-operative duplex ultrasound surveillance following arteriovenous fistula formation is associated with higher rates of post-operative intervention; however, this does not translate into improved secondary patency or the proportion of pre-haemodialysis patients commencing HD via their fistula.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Diálise Renal , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Idoso , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Inglaterra , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 58(3): 357-361, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296458

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite an increasing elderly population there is limited evidence regarding the surveillance and management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in octogenarians. This study investigated outcomes of patients aged ≥85 years undergoing AAA surveillance to identify whether discontinuation of surveillance might be safe. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients aged 85 years undergoing surveillance with a small (30-54 mm) AAA between January 2007 and November 2017. Patients were stratified depending on aneurysm diameter at index (<40 mm, 40-50 mm, > 50 mm). A threshold of 55 mm was used to decide intervention in all patients. Subsequent management of threshold aneurysms, aneurysm related and all cause mortality were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included (88 male, mean diameter at index 45 mm, median follow up 56.0 months). The majority of patients (72.3%) undergoing surveillance had not reached threshold at the end of follow up. Only one patient in the <40 mm group developed a threshold aneurysm, compared with five (11.6%) and 22 (75.9%) in the 40-50 mm and >50 mm groups, respectively (p < .0001). Of the 28 patients reaching threshold, eight (28.6%) underwent surgical repair (5 standard endovascular, one complex endovascular, and two open). Twenty-six (25.7%) patients died during follow up, with cardiorespiratory pathologies being the leading cause of death. Only three aneurysm related deaths were observed, including two fatal ruptures and one death following repair from an infected stent graft (all in the >50 mm index group). CONCLUSION: The present data suggests that discontinuation of aneurysm surveillance in patients aged 85 years with aneurysms < 40 mm might be safe. In patients with a larger aneurysm or those approaching threshold, early assessment of fitness for surgery may prevent unnecessary surveillance. The decision to treat aneurysms reaching threshold is complex but is appropriate in selected patients.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Tomada de Decisões , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Causas de Morte/tendências , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(3)2019 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850569

RESUMO

A 60-year-old man, presented with a 3-month history of a painless, non-pulsatile firm mass in the left groin. He was referred to sarcoma clinic for a biopsy following MRI and B mode ultrasound (US). This was abandoned when colour flow US imaging revealed the mass more in keeping with a pseudoaneurysm rather than malignancy. He was then referred to the vascular team for further investigation, where CT angiography revealed a large and thrombosed true aneurysm of his left femoral circumflex artery. This was treated with open surgical repair. Technical challenges included an adherent femoral nerve, which was carefully dissected off the aneurysm before the aneurysm was ligated and resected. An uneventful recovery followed with discharge within 48 hours. Follow-up duplex US scan revealed patent arteries with no further abnormalities.


Assuntos
Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/patologia , Virilha/patologia , Assistência ao Convalescente , Aneurisma/patologia , Aneurisma/cirurgia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Raras , Trombose/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla/métodos
5.
Vasc Specialist Int ; 34(3): 61-64, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30310808

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Achieving an effective seal with the Nellix endovascular aneurysm system is dependent on filling the stent bags with an appropriate volume of polymer. Calculating this volume preoperatively is essential and can be performed manually or using three-dimensional (3D) software. The aim of this project was to compare the accuracy of these two methods relative to the actual polymer volume used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing Nellix aneurysm repair were included in this retrospective study. Operation notes were analysed for the polymer volume used intra-operatively. Predicted volumes for all patients had been calculated on picture archiving and communication system (PACS) using a manual 'segmental cylinder' method. Computed tomography angiograms were then re-analysed using the Synapse 3D PACS update. The difference between groups was assessed using a paired t-test. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included in the analysis; 26 men (92.9%) and 2 women (7.1%); median age 80.9 years (interquartile range, 72.5-84.5 years). The mean volume of polymer used was 103 mL. The mean manual-derived prediction was 100.1 mL (P=0.365) and 3D-derived prediction 110.2 mL (P<0.001). Manual prediction led to an average 2.8% underestimate of polymer volume whilst 3D prediction led to an average 7.0% overestimate. CONCLUSION: Calculating predicted polymer volume for the Nellix system is more accurate using a manual approach then the 3D alternative. Whilst this method is more time-consuming, there is no significant difference when compared to the actual volume used. Quicker 3D software predictions can be utilised, but their tendency to overestimate should be recognized and taken into account during planning.

7.
EJVES Short Rep ; 37: 14-17, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29234734

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular management of aortic occlusive disease is an alternative to open surgery. This case describes the use of a Nellix graft to treat infrarenal aortic stenosis, outwith the graft indication for use. CASE REPORT: A 71 year old man with multiple comorbidities, presented with bilateral buttock claudication. A computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showed significant infrarenal aortic stenosis. Under local anaesthetic, using a percutaneous approach, Nellix grafts were inserted. The patient was discharged within 24 hours. His claudication improved significantly. A 6 month follow-up CT showed stent patency. CONCLUSION: Although further research is necessary, this case suggests that Nellix is safe and effective for primary stenting of the stenotic infrarenal aorta.

8.
Vasc Specialist Int ; 33(4): 121-134, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29354622

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Catheter direct thrombolysis (CDT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for deep venous thrombosis. The objective of the review is to improve safety and efficacy of the CDT by using ward based protocol, better able to predict complications and treatment outcome through monitoring of haemostatic parameters and clinical observation during thrombolysis procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched for all articles on deep venous thrombosis, thrombolysis and correlations of clinical events (bleeding, successful thrombolysis) during thrombolysis with hemostatic parameters to March 2016. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration's tool and Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in the review and we found that improving safety and efficacy of CDT by using ward based protocol depending on eight factors; strict patient selection criteria, types of fibrinolytic drugs, mode of fibrinolytic drug injection, biochemical markers monitoring (fibrinogen, D-dimer, activated partial thromboplastin time, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1), timing of intervention, usage of intermittent pneumatic calf, ward monitoring and thrombolysis imaging assessment (intravascular ultrasound). These factors may help to improve safety and efficacy by reducing total thrombolytic drug dosage and at the same time ensure successful lysis. There is a marked lack of randomized controlled trials discussing the safety and efficacy of catheter direct thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: CDT can be performed safely and efficiently in clinical ward, providing that careful nursing, biochemical monitoring, proper selection and mode of infusion of fibrinolytic drugs, usage of Intermittent pneumatic calf and adequate thrombolysis imaging assessment are ensured.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...